Legislature(2005 - 2006)HOUSE FINANCE 519

04/20/2006 08:30 AM House FINANCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ SB 132 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+ SB 216 BAIL RESTRICTIONS/UNLAWFUL EVASION TELECONFERENCED
Moved HCS CSSB 216(FIN) Out of Committee
+ SB 306 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND & TAXES TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
+= HB 304 COMMERCIAL FISHING LOAN PROGRAM TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 304(FIN) Out of Committee
<Bill Hearing Rescheduled from 04/18/06>
HOUSE BILL NO. 304                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
"An Act relating to the commercial  fishing loan program; and                                                                   
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  JOHN COGHILL,  SPONSOR  introduced the  bill.                                                                   
He explained  the history  of the  bill, regarding  the State                                                                   
loaning to  the fisheries.   He discussed his  initial desire                                                                   
years  ago  to  disassemble  the loan  program,  and  how  it                                                                   
eventually  educated  him  on  how  the  program  helped  the                                                                   
fishers of Alaska.  He noted that  fishers could be competing                                                                   
in the same waters, while their  loans were being provided at                                                                   
different levels  of service.  He also noted  that permitting                                                                   
in  Alaska  was  designed  to  keep  fishing  in  Alaska.  He                                                                   
concluded  that the fishing  loan program  has served  a good                                                                   
purpose.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Coghill went on  to propose, however, that the                                                                   
purpose of the  program should be as a safety  net, used only                                                                   
as  a "last  resort".    Although  he commended  the  current                                                                   
operation, he commented  that the purpose of the  bill was to                                                                   
set guidelines,  for example  requiring that applicants  also                                                                   
apply   at   other  lending   institutions,   including   the                                                                   
commercial fishing agricultural loan bank.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
8:52:24 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative   Coghill  directed   the  Committee   to  the                                                                   
requirements outlined  on page 2 of the bill,  since SEFAB is                                                                   
not  federally  chartered,  but  is the  only  other  lending                                                                   
institution statutorily  able to make loans on  permits.  The                                                                   
bill is  intended to  encourage fishers,  if viable  at other                                                                   
lending institutions, to make  their loan privately.  He also                                                                   
referred to Section  2, which changes the limit of  a loan as                                                                   
a percentage of collateral from 90% to 80%.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
8:53:51 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Section  3  limits loans:    up  to $35,000  of  federal  tax                                                                   
obligations, an allowance based  on the upward cpi; community                                                                   
quota shares  may not  exceed $2  million for each  community                                                                   
eligible under  federal statute;  the amount of  an aggregate                                                                   
loan is  limited to  $400,000.   The Sponsor  noted he  began                                                                   
with a  limit of  $300,000, but  adjusted to match  portfolio                                                                   
limits.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
8:54:29 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Coghill referred to  a change in  the lending                                                                   
rate, on Page  5, line 1.   He explained that prime  plus two                                                                   
percent was  the calculation used.   He expressed  support of                                                                   
an amendment that  clarifies this calculation.   He concluded                                                                   
that the  bill made  the loan  program more streamlined,  but                                                                   
still effective  in helping  Alaskan fishers.   He  suggested                                                                   
that it  also introduced "reality"  for fishers  in servicing                                                                   
their debt.   He  finally noted  services available  that are                                                                   
not given by other institutions:   1) (lower) application fee                                                                   
2)  refinancing   fees  waived  3)  deferred   interest  rate                                                                   
subsidy. These are benefits and  flexibilities unique to this                                                                   
program.  The Sponsor stated that  fishers in Alaska need the                                                                   
system, but proposed it should serve as a safety net.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
8:56:56 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Holm referred to  line 4 of  Page 5,  and the                                                                   
change to  80 percent  of value of  collateral. He  asked why                                                                   
this change  was made.   Representative  Coghill stated  that                                                                   
this  brought  the percentages  in  line with  other  lending                                                                   
institutions.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Coghill  conceded  that  while  this  was  an                                                                   
unfamiliar topic for  the interior, it came from  a desire to                                                                   
keep the  government from competing  with the open  market in                                                                   
providing loan service to Alaskan fishers.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Representative Chenault  asked for the Department  to address                                                                   
the fiscal note.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
8:59:35 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
GREG WINEGAR,  DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF INVESTMENTS,  DEPARTMENT                                                                   
OF COMMERCE,  testified regarding  the bill.   He noted  that                                                                   
his division had worked with the  Sponsor for quite some time                                                                   
to make program changes that would  not harm the fund itself.                                                                   
He  noted that  thousands  of  Alaskans benefited  from  this                                                                   
fund,   and   expressed  appreciation   for   the   Sponsor's                                                                   
willingness to work with Department  concerns.  He noted that                                                                   
the issue had been  worked on since the 1970's,  in an effort                                                                   
to  ensure  that Alaskans  could  participate  in  fisheries.                                                                   
They have  helped over 6,000  harvesters. He stated  that the                                                                   
program has been successful, ultimately  bringing monies into                                                                   
the General Fund.  He urged caution  in making changes to the                                                                   
program.   He expressed that they  believe that the  bill was                                                                   
able to accomplish changes effectively.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:01:24 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Winegar referred  to the  fiscal note,  and pointed  out                                                                   
that by reducing the amount of  refinancing from $300 to $200                                                                   
thousand, it would  result in one fewer loan per  year.  Also                                                                   
by reducing  the limits on loans  from $600 thousand  to $400                                                                   
thousand, it would potentially  reduce the number of loans by                                                                   
one loan  per year.   The  fiscal note  reflects the  reduced                                                                   
interest income over a six-year period.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:02:11 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Chenault  asked  about the delinquency rate of                                                                   
9.6  percent, and  whether this  was normal  for the  market.                                                                   
Mr. Winegar  commented that the  rate indicated  was actually                                                                   
higher  than the  current  rate  of 4.9  percent.   The  rate                                                                   
varies over  the years, depending  on how fisheries  succeed,                                                                   
and 9.6 percent is an average over years.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:02:54 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Chenault  referred   to   the   current   $400                                                                   
thousand  limit on outstanding  loan balances.   Mr.  Winegar                                                                   
noted  that  this  referred to  the  combination  of  various                                                                   
loans, as  fisheries can apply  for different kinds  of loans                                                                   
on different  sections of statute.   Responding to  a follow-                                                                   
up, Mr.  Winegar confirmed  that this  number was  previously                                                                   
$630  thousand, and  currently was  at $930  thousand due  to                                                                   
recent legislation referring to  product quality for tenders.                                                                   
He noted  that they had  never had anyone  borrow up  to that                                                                   
limit; while one  borrower currently owed $400  thousand, the                                                                   
majority of the portfolio is well under the limits.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
9:04:23 AM                                                                                                                    
Co-Chair  Meyer noted  that in  the fiscal  note, the  amount                                                                   
would be  lowered from $630 to  $335 thousand, as  opposed to                                                                   
$400 thousand in  the bill.  Mr. Winegar confirmed  that this                                                                   
figure needed  to be updated.   It was discovered that  a new                                                                   
fiscal note reflects the correct amount.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:04:58 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Holm asked if it  was expected that the number                                                                   
of  delinquencies or  write  offs would  change  commensurate                                                                   
with legislative changes.  Mr.  Winegar noted that he did not                                                                   
expect  changes;  the statute  would  reduce  to 80  from  90                                                                   
percent the  loan to  value ratio,  something that  by policy                                                                   
was  already occurring,  which  was  more typical  for  other                                                                   
lending institutions.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Responding  to  a  follow  up  by  Representative  Holm,  Mr.                                                                   
Winegar noted that the default  rate was at one percent, with                                                                   
a delinquency rate of 4.9 percent.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:06:23 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kelly MOVED   to  ADOPT   Amendment  #1,   24-                                                                   
LS0523\S.    He pointed  out  a  typographical error  in  the                                                                   
amendment,  from "point"  to "points"  on line  3.   Co-Chair                                                                   
Meyer     OBJECTED.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer closed public testimony on the bill.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
RYNNIEVA MOSS,  STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE  COGHILL explained  the                                                                   
Amendment.   She  noted that  the current  loan program  used                                                                   
prime rate plus,  and that the provision was  amended to 10.5                                                                   
percent  in  House Resources  Committee.    These  percentage                                                                   
rates  reflect  a  difference   in  philosophy  in  terms  of                                                                   
percentage rate  restrictions.   She pointed out  the concern                                                                   
that, when the 10.5 percent cap  was placed into statute, the                                                                   
loaning agency did not have the  ability to refinance.  There                                                                   
is also concern over the lack  of a cap on the interest rates                                                                   
used to  make bonds,  which could  hypothetically exceed  the                                                                   
interest rate on the loan.  This  provision gives the ability                                                                   
to adjust the interest rates if necessary.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:09:01 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Responding  to a  question  by Representative  Chenault,  Ms.                                                                   
Moss  noted that  prime rate  was currently  7.75, and  their                                                                   
rate was 9.5.   She explained that rates are  determined on a                                                                   
quarterly basis.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
9:09:33 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kerttula  noted  the  delinquency and  default                                                                   
rates and  asked what raising  the interest rate might  do to                                                                   
the amount of  defaults.  Mr. Winegar noted  that this simply                                                                   
added a 10.5 percent cap.  Representative Kerttula asked                                                                        
what the result was for fishers  that exceeded that cap.  Mr.                                                                   
Winegar  noted  that  their  expense  would  be  higher,  and                                                                   
mentioned a program for repayment.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:10:51 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kerttula  observed   that   the  program   was                                                                   
currently successful,  bringing in  money for the  state with                                                                   
low delinquency rates.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
9:11:20 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Moss  pointed  out that this  bill would  not affect  the                                                                   
current portfolio, and only new loans.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Responding  to  a  question  by  Representative  Foster,  Mr.                                                                   
Winegar confirmed  that the loan  program was only  for those                                                                   
who have been Alaska residents for at least two years.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer REMOVED his OBJECTION.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kerttula  OBJECTED   to  Amendment  #1.    She                                                                   
expressed her  belief that there  was no reason for  a change                                                                   
in the program.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:12:49 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Moss  explained that part of  the intent of the  bill was                                                                   
responding to a fairness issue,  since many fishers were able                                                                   
to go to  private lending institutions. She  pointed out that                                                                   
when  the  economy  changed  and  interest  rates  rose,  all                                                                   
fishers  would be  affected.   She  proposed  that since  the                                                                   
program  contained  subsidies,  it  would  provide  a  bigger                                                                   
advantage with limited interest rates.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kerttula  stressed  that  the  program was  to                                                                   
help  those   who  were   not  able   to  apply  to   lending                                                                   
institutions.   She stated that  since the program  was doing                                                                   
well, there was no need to change it.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Moss expressed  on behalf  of the  Sponsor that  caution                                                                   
should be  exercised for  these borrowers  in terms  of their                                                                   
overall  indebtedness.   She noted  that  currently a  fisher                                                                   
could apply  for up to $930  thousand, and that the  bill was                                                                   
an attempt  to limit  the amount that  fishers could  go into                                                                   
debt.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
A ROLL CALL VOTE was taken on the Amendment #1:                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
In Favor:  Kelly; Foster; Holm; Chenault; Meyer                                                                                 
Opposed: Kertulla; Moses                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Amendment #1 was ADOPTED on a Vote of 5 to 2.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative Foster    MOVED   to  REPORT  HB  304  out  of                                                                   
Committee as Amended with individual  recommendations and one                                                                   
new, zero fiscal  notes (CCED).   There being  NO OBJECTIONS,                                                                   
it was so ordered.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
CSHB304 (FIN) was  REPORTED OUT of Committee with  a new zero                                                                   
fiscal note (CCED) and individual recommendations.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects